| From: | Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Very long SQL strings |
| Date: | 2007-06-21 18:48:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20070621184833.GA10814@KanotixBox |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Steven Flatt <steven(dot)flatt(at)gmail(dot)com> schrieb:
> For example, on a toy table with two columns, I noticed about a 20% increase
> when bulking together 1000 tuples in one INSERT statement as opposed to doing
> 1000 individual INSERTS. Would this be the same for 10000? 100000? Does it
> depend on the width of the tuples or the data types?
I guess you can obtain the same if you pack all INSERTs into one
transaction.
And, faster than INSERT: COPY.
Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknow)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Francisco Reyes | 2007-06-21 18:58:33 | Re: Database-wide VACUUM ANALYZE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-21 18:45:54 | Re: Very long SQL strings |