Re: index vs. seq scan choice?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: George Pavlov <gpavlov(at)mynewplace(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: index vs. seq scan choice?
Date: 2007-05-25 02:39:22
Message-ID: 20070525023922.GV4320@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-www

Tom Lane wrote:

> (The default statistics target is 10, which is widely considered too
> low --- you might find 100 more suitable.)

Does this mean that we should look into raising the default a bit?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-05-25 02:45:17 Re: [GENERAL] index vs. seq scan choice?
Previous Message Walter Vaughan 2007-05-25 02:02:31 Cannot get autovacuum configured

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-05-25 02:45:17 Re: [GENERAL] index vs. seq scan choice?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-05-25 01:08:11 Re: index vs. seq scan choice?