From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Signing off of patches (was Re: Not ready for 8.3) |
Date: | 2007-05-19 01:45:07 |
Message-ID: | 20070519014507.GC31543@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> >Having the Linux process still in memory, I started thinking that maybe
> >what we need, is a sign-off process, whereby developer A reviews other
> >developers' patches, make comments, and when the commented-on developer
> >(call him B) has fixed the issues that A had, then A signs off B patch.
> >In return for the favor, B also reviews and signs off A patches.
> >Eventually this leads to more cooperation between otherwise independent
> >developers.
>
> You're thinking of the wrong process. What you seem to be suggesting is
> a process that mimics the Usenet Oracle[1], in which if you ask a
> question you get given one to answer ...
Interesting, but, err, not really what I was thinking.
In order to make patch review more effective, perhaps we could use some
tools to help us. How about
http://www.chipx86.com/blog/?p=222
?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-19 01:59:11 | Re: Signing off of patches (was Re: Not ready for 8.3) |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-05-19 00:27:10 | Re: Signing off of patches (was Re: Not ready for 8.3) |