Re: Not ready for 8.3

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Robert Haas" <Robert(dot)Haas(at)dyntek(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Not ready for 8.3
Date: 2007-05-17 12:42:31
Message-ID: 200705170842.32970.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 16 May 2007 13:02, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I care. I want a professional easy to understand and easy to maintain
> > that doesn't cause potential conflict with future and past development
> >
> > syntax.
>
> <snip>
> If people have strong opinions about the syntax, why
> were they not ALL expressed when the proposal was originally laid on the
> table?
<snip>
> I haven't studied the proposed syntaxes in detail,
<snip>
>

lol... just thought this was ironic. :-)

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2007-05-17 12:53:49 Re: Not ready for 8.3
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-05-17 12:16:42 Re: Not ready for 8.3