| From: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Not ready for 8.3 |
| Date: | 2007-05-16 11:03:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20070516110349.GH9991@yugib.highrise.ca |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> [070515 21:19]:
> As I proposed for many times, why don't we add message number to each
> subject line in mail? For example like this:
>
> [HACKERS: 12345] Re: Not ready for 8.3
>
> This way, we could always obtain stable (logical) pointer, without
> reling on particular archival infrastructure.
Isn't that what the "Message-Id" field is for?
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2007-05-16 11:20:16 | Re: Not ready for 8.3 |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD | 2007-05-16 08:31:30 | Re: Seq scans roadmap |