From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | magnus(at)hagander(dot)net |
Cc: | stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Not ready for 8.3 |
Date: | 2007-05-16 01:16:43 |
Message-ID: | 20070516.101643.94564776.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> >> They are not stable. The items should point to the archives, which are
> >> supposedly more stable. (I had already fixed one item in PatchStatus
> >> this morning). Really it would be much nicer to have links using the
> >> Message-Id but I doubt that's at all doable.
> >
> > hrm - I see so is there a particular reason for that behaviour ?
>
> They're stable until Bruce removes something from the queue. When
> something is removed, it's renumbered.
>
> It's how mhonarc works. It's the same with the archives - if we delete a
> mail, they get renumbered. So we never should delete, we should just
> blank out, but it has happened a couple of times.
As I proposed for many times, why don't we add message number to each
subject line in mail? For example like this:
[HACKERS: 12345] Re: Not ready for 8.3
This way, we could always obtain stable (logical) pointer, without
reling on particular archival infrastructure.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-16 01:25:09 | Re: [PATCHES] Reviewers Guide to DeferredTransactions/TransactionGuarantee |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-16 00:47:35 | Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulkoperationsavoiding WAL |