Re: 8.3 pending patch queue

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3 pending patch queue
Date: 2007-05-15 22:50:10
Message-ID: 200705152250.l4FMoAU20887@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > If people want proof that we have had some patches for months, this
> > email is from Simon from January, 2007.
> >
>
> I don't think anyone (at least sanely) questions that there are patches
> hanging out there.

My point is that pushing them for 8.4 effectively doesn't move us
forward because we have been "pushing" for a while.

And you can't blame tracking because everyone knows what has to happen.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:04 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>
> >>> I will start processing the patches held for 8.3 this week or next, now
> >>> that the holiday break is over:
> >>>
> >>> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
> >>>
> >> The following patches don't appear on this list:
> >>
> >> Concurrent psql
> >> Original submission
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00249.php
> >> Latest
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-12/msg00527.php
> >> Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/concurrent/index.html
> >>
> >> WAL Index Split
> >> Original submission
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-12/msg00045.php
> >> Latest
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-01/msg00000.php
> >>
> >> Grouped Items
> >> Latest
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-11/msg00051.php
> >> Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/git/index.html
> >>
> >> Maintain Cluster Order
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00124.php
> >>
> >> All have been awaiting review for at least a month (though in one case
> >> the latest version is quite recent). They probably ought to be on the
> >> hold queue; all are ready to be reviewed for final
> >> application/rejection.
> >>
> >> I'd hasten to add that none of those are mine. My patches have received
> >> good attention, so I'm not complaining just completing admin.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Simon Riggs
> >> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >>
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2007-05-15 22:58:33 Re: Not ready for 8.3
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-05-15 22:46:51 Re: Seq scans roadmap