| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Macros for typtype (was Re: Arrays of Complex Types) |
| Date: | 2007-04-01 00:28:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200704010228.56249.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I just realized that I need to check every usage of typtype to be
> > sure that the enums patch is sane. So, barring objection, I intend
> > to take this opportunity to make the code stop referring directly
> > to 'b', 'c' etc whereever possible. Any objections to these names?
> >
> > #define TYPTYPE_BASE 'b'
> > #define TYPTYPE_COMPOSITE 'c'
> > #define TYPTYPE_DOMAIN 'd'
> > #define TYPTYPE_ENUM 'e'
> > #define TYPTYPE_PSEUDO 'p'
>
> I like macros. ;-)
Why not enums? ;-)
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-04-01 01:30:34 | pgbench transaction timestamps |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2007-04-01 00:22:18 | Re: Macros for typtype (was Re: Arrays of Complex Types) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Dunstan | 2007-04-01 01:05:48 | Re: Current enums patch |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2007-04-01 00:22:18 | Re: Macros for typtype (was Re: Arrays of Complex Types) |