Re: Synchronized Scan update

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Synchronized Scan update
Date: 2007-03-06 16:43:25
Message-ID: 200703060843.25838.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

JD,

> Don't get me wrong, I want things to be easily understandable as well
> but the reason you site above pretty much
> makes us need to remove most of the postgresql.conf, including all
> bgwriter, vacuum cost delay, and autovac settings.
> Not to mention commit delay and others ;).

Wouldn't that be nice!

The explosion of GUC settings is primarily a result of not enough information.
The reason there are 7 bgwriter settings, for example, is that we have no
idea what those settings should be and are hoping that people will tinker
with them and tell us. Someday when I can fully profile bgwriter, we'll just
have one setting: bgwriter_aggressive, set to a number between 0 and 9.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2007-03-06 16:43:54 Re: GIST and TOAST
Previous Message Nik 2007-03-06 16:33:13 No buffer space available