Re: Synchronized Scan update

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Synchronized Scan update
Date: 2007-03-02 23:49:53
Message-ID: 200703021549.54084.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff,

> Right now they are just constants defined in a header, but a GUC might
> make sense. I'd like to know which version is more acceptable when I
> submit my final patch.

As much as I hate the thought of more GUCs, until we have a solid
performance profile for synch scan we probably need them. You should
include the option to turn synch_scan off, such as by setting
synch_scan_threshold to -1.

Oh, and remember that these now need to be able to take K/MB/GB.

These options should probably go in postgresql.conf under QUERY TUNING,
with their own sub-head.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-02 23:59:50 Re: Arrays of Complex Types
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-03-02 23:46:32 Re: broken doc