Re: REVOKE ALL

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Legault <legault(dot)david(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REVOKE ALL
Date: 2007-02-21 15:33:55
Message-ID: 20070221153355.GS25424@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

David Legault escribió:

> It's marked with an % saying it's easy to implement, but isn't with a "-" so
> it won't be in 8.3.

Note that having a "-" in front means "somebody already coded it and the
patch has been committed". Not having it does not mean it won't be in
8.3; it means nobody has done it _yet_. So you still have a chance to
put the "-" in there before the 8.3 development cycle ends, if you have
sufficient motivation.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2007-02-21 15:39:31 Re: tsearch2: word position
Previous Message Michael Nolan 2007-02-21 15:20:19 How can you tell if a function is immutable from psql?