| From: | Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] Deadlock on transaction |
| Date: | 2007-02-12 18:45:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20070212184548.GA2090@KanotixBox |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-sql |
Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha <ezequias(dot)rocha(at)gmail(dot)com> schrieb:
> I mean really deadlock. Other transactions can't access the database until the
> main transaction is complete. A question:
That's not true.
>
> PostgreSQL doesn't permit multiple transactions concurrently ?
Why not? Show us a complete case. PG works fine with many users on many
connections and many transactions, at the same time.
>
> Ezequias
>
> 2007/2/12, Scott Marlowe <_s_m_a_r_l_o_w_e_(at)_g_2_s_w_i_t_c_h_w_o_r_k_s_(dot)_c_o_m>:
Please, no silly fullquote betlow the answer and no html.
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknow)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha | 2007-02-12 18:47:51 | Re: [SQL] Deadlock on transaction |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-02-12 18:43:49 | Re: [SQL] Deadlock on transaction |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha | 2007-02-12 18:47:51 | Re: [SQL] Deadlock on transaction |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-02-12 18:43:49 | Re: [SQL] Deadlock on transaction |