Re: [ADMIN] Deadlock on transaction

From: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Deadlock on transaction
Date: 2007-02-12 18:45:48
Message-ID: 20070212184548.GA2090@KanotixBox
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-sql

Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha <ezequias(dot)rocha(at)gmail(dot)com> schrieb:

> I mean really deadlock. Other transactions can't access the database until the
> main transaction is complete. A question:

That's not true.

>
> PostgreSQL doesn't permit multiple transactions concurrently ?

Why not? Show us a complete case. PG works fine with many users on many
connections and many transactions, at the same time.

>
> Ezequias
>
> 2007/2/12, Scott Marlowe <_s_m_a_r_l_o_w_e_(at)_g_2_s_w_i_t_c_h_w_o_r_k_s_(dot)_c_o_m>:

Please, no silly fullquote betlow the answer and no html.

--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknow)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha 2007-02-12 18:47:51 Re: [SQL] Deadlock on transaction
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2007-02-12 18:43:49 Re: [SQL] Deadlock on transaction

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha 2007-02-12 18:47:51 Re: [SQL] Deadlock on transaction
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2007-02-12 18:43:49 Re: [SQL] Deadlock on transaction