| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was |
| Date: | 2007-01-28 23:36:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20070128233611.GF32296@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-patches pgsql-sql |
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 05:02:24PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > I don't like that because it parenthesizes the most important part of
> > > the message, which is a style-guideline violation at least in spirit.
> > > How about
> > >
> > > ... terminated by signal 10: Bus error
> >
> > I like that.
>
> OK, but you guys added back that colon you didn't like. :-)
Placement is crucial. Compare
terminated by signal 10: Bus error <-- proposed version
terminated by signal: 10 Bus error <-- older version
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | james fu | 2007-01-29 02:00:58 | Re: mingw compilation problem-> warning: implicit declaration of function `bzero' |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-28 22:02:24 | Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-01-29 07:19:33 | Re: Ctid chain following enhancement |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-01-28 22:06:10 | Re: uuid patch 3.0 (8.3devel) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arnau | 2007-01-29 12:21:13 | Very strange postgresql behaviour |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-28 22:02:24 | Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was |