Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp major release 8.3.0,

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp major release 8.3.0,
Date: 2007-01-11 12:15:56
Message-ID: 20070111121556.GB29614@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:49:59AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:51:11AM +0100, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> > There are, see for example
> > ecpg/test/expected/compat_informix-dec_test-MinGW32.stdout
> >
> > AFAIK there were no other platforms except for MinGW that need special
> > treatment.
>
> Talking about MinGW, do all MinGW systems return:
>
> Connection refused (0x0000274D/10061)
>
> if the connection is refused, or do the numbers differ?

It shuold be the same - 10061 is the win32 error code. 274D is just the
hex version of the same one.

> Or in other words, do we need the sed call in pg_regress.sh or could we
> do this with a arch specific expected file too?

Can't comment on that one, since I just noticed it existed. How similar
was this one to the "standard regression tests"? Those were moved into a
C executable so they'd run on a Windows system without a shell, could
the same be done relatively easilyi with this one?

(Obviously we can't run the ecpg regression tests on msvc builds now -
oops, didn't know those had their own script)

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2007-01-11 12:21:49 Re: share info between backends
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-01-11 12:15:50 Re: table partioning performance