Re: effective_cache_size vs units

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date: 2006-12-19 22:51:57
Message-ID: 200612192351.59402.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> I am not suggestion variant capitalization. I am suggestion a simple
> document patch to help eliminate what may not be obvious.

Perhaps it would be more effective to clarify the error message? Right
now it just says something to the effect of "invalid integer". I'd
imagine "invalid memory unit: TB" would be less confusing.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mario 2006-12-19 22:52:10 psql: core dumped
Previous Message Brandon Aiken 2006-12-19 22:50:13 Re: Autovacuum Improvements