| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: a question for the way-back machine |
| Date: | 2006-12-14 18:18:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20061214181844.GF24370@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:35:47AM -0800, Ben wrote:
> Interesting. Is that plan cached for the life of the session doing the
> inserts, the life of the trigger, or until the database is restarted?
Duration of a session, there is no support to cache a plan for any other
period.
> I guess I'm trying to figure out how to get the plan to re-cache, without
> making it entirely dynamic.
I don't think you can. Restarting the connection should be enough.
Have a ncie day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-12-14 18:32:53 | Re: [GENERAL] Subcribing to this list, what's the |
| Previous Message | Richard Broersma Jr | 2006-12-14 18:00:51 | Re: Are updateable view as a linked table in ms-access a bad idea?[solved] |