Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Matt Miller <pgsql(at)mattmillersf(dot)fastmail(dot)fm>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work
Date: 2006-11-18 03:33:29
Message-ID: 20061118033329.GC3075@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Matt Miller wrote:

> Yeah, and I don't expect that they'll be a rush to commit this to head
> anytime soon. I'll be happy enough tracking this locally. I think it's
> a win for my situation.
>
Why should we add this Oraclism to PostgreSQL? I doesn't add any new
feature.
I suggest you to contribute this kind of code to orafce project [1]
because it's not standardized.

[1] http://pgfoundry.org/projects/orafce/

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-18 03:49:39 Re: [GENERAL] Shutting down a warm standby database in 8.2beta3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-18 02:41:30 Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-18 03:37:35 Re: zic data updates
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-18 03:26:05 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clarify description of CIDR-address column