| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SPF Record ... |
| Date: | 2006-11-17 14:52:05 |
| Message-ID: | 200611171552.06746.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Am Freitag, 17. November 2006 15:12 schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
> Unless I've mis-read something, the above only applies if we went totally
> strict and used -all ... as long as we used ?all, you wouldn't be affected
> at all, since we'd be acknowledging that other hosts could send, but that
> we know that *our* registered IPs (a / mx) *do* send ...
Well, sure, but then this whole construction is zero purpose.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-11-17 14:55:49 | Re: SPF Record ... |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2006-11-17 14:47:45 | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |