| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation |
| Date: | 2006-11-03 16:34:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20061103163416.GA551@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:25:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Since 8.1 has done this all along and no one's actually complained about
> it, I guess no one is using scripts that do "cd". I'm inclined to go
> with Bernd's suggestion to change the docs to match the code, but does
> anyone have a contrary opinion?
Arguably you could give people a choice, say %P for the absolute path
and %p for the relative one. In Unix you can easily prepend $PWD to the
string, but I don't know how easy that is in Windows.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-11-03 17:05:47 | Re: Coding style question |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-03 16:27:36 | Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2006-11-03 17:37:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-03 16:25:09 | Re: Bug in WAL backup documentation |