| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: ./configure argument checking |
| Date: | 2006-10-13 18:40:42 |
| Message-ID: | 200610132040.43552.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Not sure what to do about that --- I doubt that raising this warning
> to error would be a good idea, seeing how firmly the upstream
> developers believe it shouldn't even be a warning. Is there any sort
> of "quiet mode" possible that would report only warnings? Would it
> be a good idea if it were possible?
peter(at)colt:~/devel/pg82/pgsql$ ./configure --enable-foo --quiet
*** Option ignored: --enable-foo
peter(at)colt:~/devel/pg82/pgsql$
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2006-10-13 18:45:45 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-13 18:36:51 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |