From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ./configure argument checking |
Date: | 2006-10-13 00:51:01 |
Message-ID: | 200610130051.k9D0p1q24490@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> >> IIRC it was made a non-fatal warning somewhere near the end of the
> >> output, but I'm not sure...
>
> > It spits out this line just before it creates its output files:
> > *** Option ignored: --with-lkjasdf
>
> Of course, since it spits out pages and pages of normally-useless trivia,
> we've all become conditioned to ignore configure's output as long as it
> doesn't actually fail :-(
>
> Not sure what to do about that --- I doubt that raising this warning to
> error would be a good idea, seeing how firmly the upstream developers
> believe it shouldn't even be a warning. Is there any sort of "quiet
> mode" possible that would report only warnings? Would it be a good idea
> if it were possible?
I think one idea is a "pedantic" mode that fails if an unrecognized
option is supplied.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Casey Duncan | 2006-10-13 00:53:29 | Re: Hints (Was: Index Tuning Features) |
Previous Message | Carlos Chacon | 2006-10-12 23:42:51 | Re: Modification to the postgres catalog |