Re: log_duration is redundant, no?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
Date: 2006-09-09 16:33:10
Message-ID: 200609091833.11254.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > #2, I think, but I am confused if you don't know the query, how
> > valuable is the log_duration.
>
> Statistics?

I doubt that there is a statistical merit to calculating aggregate
values over the duration of an anonymous set of queries.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2006-09-09 17:26:08 Re: Proposal for GUID datatype
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-09-09 15:47:41 Schedualed Server Downtime