| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
| Date: | 2006-09-03 21:32:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20060903213251.GB11067@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 03:40:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This is also an interesting example for a tracker. If we had one, all
> discussion on the patch would be in one place, but I am thinking that
> would require all posting to happen in a browser, or somehow have emails
> tagged to attach to each item. Is that something that can happen
> easily? I don't know. Would the repost of a patch be attached to the
> original submission?
In debbugs for example, the bug gets an email address
<bugnumber>@bugs.project.site. Anything sent to that address gets
recorded in the bug. So as long as people hit "reply-to-all" the whole
thread will be archived in the bug.
I assume other bug trackers have a similar feature...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-09-03 21:36:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-09-03 21:09:44 | Re: Concurrent connections in psql patch |