From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new variable |
Date: | 2006-09-02 16:41:22 |
Message-ID: | 200609021641.k82GfMR25521@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd be less unhappy with this patch if the variable were not marked
> GUC_REPORT. That is what gives it nontrivial cost: it's adding a couple
> dozen bytes to every connection startup exchange, for data that's 100%
> redundant with data already being transmitted.
Wow, that is bad.
> The arguments that were made in favor of this patch cited its possible
> use in SQL scripts, but there is no need for the variable to be marked
> GUC_REPORT for that usage.
Agreed, will update. We can always change it later.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-02 17:05:29 | pgsql: Add functions to /contrib/pgstattuple that show index statistics |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-02 16:39:16 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new variable "server_version_num", which is almost the same |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-09-02 16:55:39 | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-02 16:40:34 | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |