From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Lukas Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
Date: | 2006-08-08 17:58:21 |
Message-ID: | 200608081758.k78HwLV13023@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>
> >> For example:
> >>
> >> Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o
> >> option is no longer needed | PeterE | Confirmed for 8.2 | 07/20/06
> >
> >
> > We could do that, but once an item is done I don't see the point in
> > having the date and person's name. You are right that is clearly a
> > different purpose from the TODO list, and if someone wants to track
> > that, it might help things.
>
> The idea of the above is not to track when it is done. THe "confirmed"
> is to track that development is taking place and that we have confirmed
> from the developer that they think it will be done for 8.2.
Oh, "confirmed" confused me. Maybe "anticipated" or "planned" for 8.2.
> It is something that in theory would update throughout the cycle 3 or 4
> times. You could even have:
>
> Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o
> option is no longer needed | PeterE | Confirmed for 8.2 | 04/20/06
>
>
> Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o
> option is no longer needed | PeterE | Trouble encountered | 06/20/06
>
> Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o
> option is no longer needed | PeterE | Asks for help | 08/20/06
>
> Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o
> option is no longer needed | Alvaro | Confirmed | 09/20/06
>
> Notice the sequence of events. I am not saying the specific statuses are
> the way to go but it would give a simple way to keep tabs on things
> without having to create a whole new ball of yarn.
Interesting idea. If people willing to state they will complete items
for the next release, I can add this to the TODO list, and just remove
it once the item is in CVS.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-08-08 18:08:52 | Re: standard interfaces for replication providers |
Previous Message | korryd@enterprisedb.com | 2006-08-08 17:35:52 | Re: PL instrumentation plugin support (i.e. PL/pgSQL |