Re: PL instrumentation plugin support (i.e. PL/pgSQL

From: "korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL instrumentation plugin support (i.e. PL/pgSQL
Date: 2006-08-08 17:35:52
Message-ID: 1155058552.6960.29.camel@sakai.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> In view of the other patch submitted to support init/fini functions for
> shared libraries, I'm inclined to change this one to depend on that;
> in particular it seems like we could eliminate the necessity for users
> to specify the correct setup-function names. Thoughts?

I think that would be great. Can you point me to the patch you're
referring to? I can convert my patch if you prefer.

-- Korry

--
Korry Douglas korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-08 17:58:21 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-08 17:26:25 Re: PL instrumentation plugin support (i.e. PL/pgSQL debugger infrastructure)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-08 18:49:16 Re: Fixed definition of complicated errcode of ms_vc8
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-08 17:26:25 Re: PL instrumentation plugin support (i.e. PL/pgSQL debugger infrastructure)