Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date: 2006-07-25 15:27:55
Message-ID: 200607251527.k6PFRtS12172@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing wrote:
> ?hel kenal p?eval, T, 2006-07-25 kell 10:51, kirjutas Bruce Momjian:
> > Where are we on these TODO items:
> >
>
> > o Add reporting of the current WAL file, perhaps as part of
> > partial log file archiving
>
> It would be nice to have a function that tells both filename and offset
> of current WAL file, so it would be possible to do live async streaming
> of up-to-subsecond changes without too much overhead.

OK, "offset" added to TODO item. What would the offset give us?

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-25 15:31:58 Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-25 15:26:21 Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation