Re: 8.2 features?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(dot)ebrecht(at)credativ(dot)de>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features?
Date: 2006-07-14 01:30:26
Message-ID: 20060714013026.GH17269@kenobi.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

* Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > . MERGE (at least in PK case)
>
> I think that died after we figured out that it didn't do the sort of
> UPDATE-else-INSERT thing that people wanted out of it.

I agree that it's probably not going to happen for 8.2 but I certainly
have uses for the SQL spec's definition of MERGE (table-level instead of
the individual-tuple case). I'd like to see the individual-tuple
UPSERT/REPLACE issue handled as well but I don't believe MERGE lacking
that necessairly means MERGE should be ignored..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-07-14 01:50:06 Re: 8.2 features?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-07-14 00:58:13 maintenance diff

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-07-14 01:31:00 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-07-14 01:25:28 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-07-14 01:50:06 Re: 8.2 features?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-07-14 00:58:13 maintenance diff