From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take |
Date: | 2006-06-27 19:07:05 |
Message-ID: | 200606271907.k5RJ75I10301@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Applied.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > Seeing stats_command_string with almost zero overhead is great news!
> > > Should we remove that setting and just have it enabled all
> > > the time?
> >
> > If you don't need it, you shouldn't have to pay any overhead for it,
> > I think. One could make an argument now for having stats_command_string
> > default to ON, though.
>
> The attached patch makes stats_command_string default to 'on', and
> updates the documentation.
>
> > Something that might also be interesting is an option to suppress
> > per-command ps_status reporting. On machines where updating ps status
> > takes a kernel call, there's now a pretty good argument why you might
> > want to turn that off and rely on pg_stat_activity instead.
>
> OK, can I get a timing report from someone with the title on/off that
> shows a difference?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-06-27 19:13:14 | Re: GIN index creation extremely slow ? |
Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-06-27 19:02:13 | Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-06-27 20:26:13 | Re: Client build of MSVC6+ patch |
Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-06-27 19:02:13 | Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? |