Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-18 17:16:06
Message-ID: 20060518171606.GE4834@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:

> Personally, I'd go after MSSQL before I bothered with MySQL. Sure, let's
> make *migration* easier for those who wake up and smell the BS, but migration
> can (and probably should) be one-way.

Yeah. Let's write a Transact-SQL PL handler.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-05-18 17:25:06 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-05-18 17:10:37 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-05-18 17:16:08 Re: autovacuum "connections" are hidden
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-05-18 17:10:37 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?