Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: > >> Patch applied. Thanks. > > > Has this been reviewed at all? I thought we were still discussing what > > the behavior should be, let alone whether the patch is correct. > > Actually, now that I look at it, this patch is definitely *not* correct, > as it does not implement any of the behaviors suggested as reasonable; > and the discussion is still ongoing in any case. > > Please revert.