Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>, josh(dot)berkus(at)sun(dot)com, robert(dot)lor(at)sun(dot)com, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
Date: 2006-04-30 00:24:59
Message-ID: 10192.1146356699@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> In short, it ain't broken and we don't need to fix it.

> Agreed. Should the new Solaris ASM code be modified?

No, I have no objection to the new code for Solaris. I just don't want
to go off changing TAS macros for the sake of change.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message amel 2006-05-01 06:16:19 BUG #2415: "make install" failde during the installation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-30 00:16:16 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-30 01:09:19 Re: Patch for BUG #2073: Can't drop sequence when created
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-30 00:16:16 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64