Re: NLS vs error processing, again

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, jw(dot)pgsql(at)sduept(dot)com
Subject: Re: NLS vs error processing, again
Date: 2006-04-05 13:03:54
Message-ID: 200604051503.56309.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm far from an expert on this, but the gettext documentation
> indicates that it tries to translate the .po file contents into
> whatever encoding is implied by LC_CTYPE.

Correct. That is just one more reason to have server encoding,
LC_COLLATE, and LC_CTYPE matching. In practice, there is hardly a
reason to have LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE be different, so the problem
should not be that big.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brock Peabody 2006-04-05 14:03:20 Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed error
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-04-05 12:13:20 Re: NLS vs error processing, again (was Re: Composite Type