Re: majordomo unmaintained, postmaster emails ignored?

From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser(at)sigpipe(dot)cz>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: majordomo unmaintained, postmaster emails ignored?
Date: 2006-02-28 12:04:31
Message-ID: 20060228120431.GA80007@isis.sigpipe.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

# scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org / 2006-02-27 16:32:55 -0400:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>
> ># scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org / 2006-02-26 19:01:58 -0400:
> >>'k, I just checked all the lists you listed, and you are subscribed to
> >>each of them ... are you not receiving messages?

(...)

> Can you try something more recent then "last year"?

Here's a copy of an email I sent you off list documenting
stalled-for-approval requests from yesterday.

: Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:43:54 +0100
: From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser(at)sigpipe(dot)cz>
: To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
: Subject: Re: [GENERAL] majordomo unmaintained, postmaster emails ignored?
: Message-ID: <20060227144354(dot)GK65308(at)isis(dot)sigpipe(dot)cz>
: References: <20060226182908(dot)GB39348(at)isis(dot)sigpipe(dot)cz> <20060226143419(dot)D1005(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>
: Mime-Version: 1.0
: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
: Content-Disposition: inline
: In-Reply-To: <20060226143419(dot)D1005(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>
: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
: Status: RO
:
: Note: I've removed pgsql-general@ from the recipient list so as to
: reduce clutter. Feel free to add it again for you reply if you feel
: this is relevant on that list.
:
: # scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org / 2006-02-26 14:36:47 -0400:
: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
: > >I've been waiting five months for the majordomo moderators to approve
: > >my subscription requests to several @postgresql.org mailing lists.
: >
: > the majordomo moderators don't have to approve subscribe requests
:
: The above is false under *certain circumstances*. Marc, can you
: tell me what attribute(s) of these requests cause(s) majordomo to
: wait for approval?
:
: I've just had this exchange with majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org (only the hackers
: request is put here for brevity):
:
: : Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:28:18 +0100
: : From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser(at)sigpipe(dot)cz>
: : To: majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
: :
: : subscribe-set pgsql-docs noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-docs#postgresql(dot)org(at)sigpipe(dot)cz
: : subscribe-set pgsql-hackers noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql(dot)org(at)sigpipe(dot)cz
: : subscribe-set pgsql-performance noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-perf#postgresql(dot)org(at)sigpipe(dot)cz
: : subscribe-set pgsql-sql noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-sql#postgresql(dot)org(at)sigpipe(dot)cz
:
: : Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:28:18 -0400
: : From: majordomo-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
: : To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser(at)sigpipe(dot)cz>
: : Subject: Majordomo results
: :
: :
: : >>>> subscribe-set pgsql-hackers noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql(dot)org(at)sigpipe(dot)cz
: : ---- The subscribe command did not succeed.
: : ----
: : ---- The request
: : ---- "subscribe-set pgsql-hackers noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql(dot)org(at)sigpipe(dot)cz"
: : ---- must be confirmed by
: : ---- neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql(dot)org(at)sigpipe(dot)cz
: : ---- and approved by the moderators. Confirmation instructions have been
: : ---- mailed in a separate message.
: : ----
:
: : Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:28:17 -0400
: : From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
: : To: neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql(dot)org(at)sigpipe(dot)cz
: : Subject: BC9A-BD57-4C44 : CONFIRM from pgsql-hackers (subscribe)
: :
: : __
: : The following request
: :
: : "subscribe-set pgsql-hackers noprefix neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql(dot)org(at)sigpipe(dot)cz"
: :
: : was sent to
: : by Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser(at)sigpipe(dot)cz>.
: :
: : To accept or reject this request, please do one of the following:
: (...)
:
: : Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:29:11 +0100
: : From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql(dot)org(at)sigpipe(dot)cz>
: : To: majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
: : Subject: Re: BC9A-BD57-4C44 : CONFIRM from pgsql-hackers (subscribe)
: :
: : accept BC9A-BD57-4C44
:
: : Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:29:13 -0400
: : From: majordomo-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
: : To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser+pgsql-hack#postgresql(dot)org(at)sigpipe(dot)cz>
: : Subject: Majordomo results: Re: BC9A-BD57-4C44 : CONFIRM from pgsql-
: :
: :
: : >>>> accept BC9A-BD57-4C44
: : ---- The accept command for token BC9A-BD57-4C44 succeeded,
: : ---- but further approval is needed.
: : ----
: : ---- Now the request must be approved by the moderators.
: : ---- The results will be mailed to you after this is done.
: : ----
: : ----
: :
: : Valid commands processed: 1
: : 0 succeeded, 1 stalled, and 0 failed.
: :
: :
: : Use the following command:
: : sessioninfo 530ce04b8a9f02fee27a58acb99d9cb88a092ae2
: : to see technical information about this session.

--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Douglas McNaught 2006-02-28 12:28:12 Re: Size comparison between a Composite type and an
Previous Message pgsql-general@list.coretech.ro 2006-02-28 11:40:47 Re: Temporal Databases, offtopic - relative updates