Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, joe(at)mcknight(dot)de, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: ALTER CONSTRAINT RENAME patch reverted
Date: 2006-02-12 19:13:51
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This patch appears seriously broken, in particular every routine I
> >> looked at contained incorrect locking assumptions.  Nor do I care
> >> for using pg_depend for the purposes it's being used for here.
> > OK, how do we proceed?  Revert or apply a second patch?
> I'd say revert; the patch is going to need significant rework.

OK, patch reverted.  Updated version attached.  Please adjust and
resubmit.  Thanks.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to


pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: James William PyeDate: 2006-02-12 19:18:28
Subject: python - pq: Get rid of the superfluous 'Ignition' message.
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-02-12 19:13:19
Subject: pgsql: Not done: > o %Allow ALTER TABLE ...

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-02-12 19:24:09
Subject: Re: Patch to readme
Previous:From: Sergey E. KoposovDate: 2006-02-12 17:34:26
Subject: Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group