| From: | Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Schema bug |
| Date: | 2005-12-13 23:44:29 |
| Message-ID: | 200512140044.29917.guillaume.lelarge@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le Mardi 13 Décembre 2005 00:48, Guillaume LELARGE a écrit :
> Le Samedi 10 Décembre 2005 16:55, Andreas Pflug a écrit :
> > Dave Page wrote:
> > >>I still think this patch should be applied.
> > >
> > > Does anyone see a reason /not/ to do this?
> >
> > Hm, Guillaume started a thread on pgsql-hackers about renaming system
> > schemas in general, maybe we should wait for the result of that
> > discussion.
>
> Well, it seems that pg_* schemas are system schemas and that public and
> information_schema schemas are public one. I think we should exclude system
> schemas depending on their names and show public and information_schema,
> whatever their actual name are.
>
> I can bring a new patch if you agree with this and if you find this useful.
What about this one ?
--
Guillaume.
<!-- http://abs.traduc.org/
http://lfs.traduc.org/
http://traduc.postgresqlfr.org/ -->
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pgSchema.patch | text/x-diff | 812 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-12-14 08:21:39 | Re: Schema bug |
| Previous Message | Guillaume LELARGE | 2005-12-13 07:09:37 | Re: Schema bug |