| From: | Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Schema bug |
| Date: | 2005-12-12 23:48:55 |
| Message-ID: | 200512130048.56153.guillaume.lelarge@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le Samedi 10 Décembre 2005 16:55, Andreas Pflug a écrit :
> Dave Page wrote:
> >>I still think this patch should be applied.
> >
> > Does anyone see a reason /not/ to do this?
>
> Hm, Guillaume started a thread on pgsql-hackers about renaming system
> schemas in general, maybe we should wait for the result of that discussion.
>
Well, it seems that pg_* schemas are system schemas and that public and
information_schema schemas are public one. I think we should exclude system
schemas depending on their names and show public and information_schema,
whatever their actual name are.
I can bring a new patch if you agree with this and if you find this useful.
--
Guillaume.
<!-- http://abs.traduc.org/
http://lfs.traduc.org/
http://traduc.postgresqlfr.org/ -->
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-13 00:20:09 | Re: Schema bug |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-12 23:37:54 | Re: Schema bug |