Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)
Date: 2005-12-05 05:10:35
Message-ID: 200512050510.jB55AZ606124@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Hm. One of the main problems I found was incorrect results for
> > LONGLONG_MIN (-2^63). I'm rather tempted to add a test case for
> > that to the int8 regression test and see if any platforms fail ;-)
>
> Done ... let me know whether the back branches still pass regression
> for you ;-)

I checked back to 7.3 and everything passed. I did a cvs update,
configure, gmake, and regression run for each branch.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-05 05:25:33 Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-12-05 04:45:53 Re: Selecting Large Object and TOAST

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-05 05:21:41 Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2005-12-05 04:43:59 Re: Upcoming PG re-releases

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-05 05:21:41 Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-05 04:47:15 Re: psql, tab completion additions