From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) |
Date: | 2005-12-05 05:10:35 |
Message-ID: | 200512050510.jB55AZ606124@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Hm. One of the main problems I found was incorrect results for
> > LONGLONG_MIN (-2^63). I'm rather tempted to add a test case for
> > that to the int8 regression test and see if any platforms fail ;-)
>
> Done ... let me know whether the back branches still pass regression
> for you ;-)
I checked back to 7.3 and everything passed. I did a cvs update,
configure, gmake, and regression run for each branch.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-05 05:25:33 | Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-12-05 04:45:53 | Re: Selecting Large Object and TOAST |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-05 05:21:41 | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2005-12-05 04:43:59 | Re: Upcoming PG re-releases |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-05 05:21:41 | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-05 04:47:15 | Re: psql, tab completion additions |