Re: Crash during elog.c...

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Crash during elog.c...
Date: 2005-11-07 19:58:15
Message-ID: 20051107195815.GD19551@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:06:39PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> > My client (same one with the slru.c issue) has had 3 of these in the
> > past day...
>
> > (gdb) print *str
> > $39 = {data = 0x848030 "2005-11-04 00:01:02 EST|2005-11-04 00:00:08 EST|216.187.113.78(39476)|didit|", len = 76,
> > maxlen = 256, cursor = 0}
>
> Um, what's your log_line_prefix setting, and is the next format code
> %i by any chance? I've just noticed an utterly brain-dead assumption
> somebody stuck into ps_status.c awhile back.

log_line_prefix = '%t|%s|%r|%d|%i|%p'

So yeah, looks like %i is next. I recall seeing something about %i in
the backtrace or something else related to this, but I can't find it
now.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Maxwell 2005-11-07 20:07:15 Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
Previous Message Mark Cave-Ayland 2005-11-07 19:44:14 Any advice about function caching?