Re: BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: C Wegrzyn <lists(at)garbagedump(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR
Date: 2005-10-20 14:11:04
Message-ID: 200510201611.05802.meskes@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Am Freitag, 14. Oktober 2005 21:15 schrieb C Wegrzyn:
> The customer I am writing this for will only accept it based on released
> code. That means I run either 8.0.3 or 8.0.4.

Would it help you if I do a special ecpg release just for you? Or does it have
to be part of the postgres release?

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-20 16:56:38 Re: SIGSEGV in Postgres 8.0.3 (libpq4)
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2005-10-20 12:40:01 Re: BUG #1978: connection sinks

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-20 14:15:19 Re: [HACKERS] tuning seqscan costs
Previous Message Andrew Kelly 2005-10-20 13:48:43 Re: [HACKERS] 'a' == 'a '

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew 2005-10-20 14:33:02 Re: patch for pg_autovacuum 8.0.x prevent segv for dropped
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-20 13:54:55 Re: palloc check for pg_md5_encrypt