Re: License question[VASCL:A1077160A86]

On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 04:14:03PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 09:49:06PM +1000, Neil Dugan wrote:
> >
> > If I was to develop a 'C' project that only used the libpg.so library and the
> > rest was my own stuff would I need to preserve the copyright to somehow?
>
> Yes, because libpg.so is licensed under the BSD license. Note that
> you can do this in a COPYRIGHT file. It just has to be "in all
> copies", whatever that means.

AFAIK, this would only apply if he was actually distributing libpq.so,
which would be a bad thing for technical reasons anyway.

> People are actually slightly oversimplifying, because when you
> distribute you also have to distribute two paragraphs.
>
> The license is available, among other places, from this URL:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/licence
>
> It has _got_ to be the easiest piece of legalese you'll ever

Not easy enough to avoid confusion though. :)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461