Re: License question[VASCL:A1077160A86]

From: Neil Dugan <postgres(at)butterflystitches(dot)com(dot)au>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: License question[VASCL:A1077160A86]
Date: 2005-10-05 11:49:06
Message-ID: 200510052149.07143.postgres@butterflystitches.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday 05 October 2005 06:41, Aaron Glenn wrote:
> On 10/4/05, Welty, Richard <richard(dot)welty(at)bankofamerica(dot)com> wrote:
> > Aaron Glenn wrote:
> > >Completely incorrect. You can do whatever you like with PostgreSQL;
> > >you just can't sue anyone when things go south.
> >
> > _and_ you need to preserve the copyright notices.
>
> excellent point.
>

If I was to develop a 'C' project that only used the libpg.so library and the
rest was my own stuff would I need to preserve the copyright to somehow?

I wouldn't be distributing any source at all just my executable and the
library.

Regards Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Douglas McNaught 2005-10-05 12:11:05 Re: Or selection on index versus union
Previous Message Markus Schulz 2005-10-05 09:38:19 Re: selfmade datatype in C and server-crash