Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1
Date: 2005-09-22 23:25:03
Message-ID: 200509222325.j8MNP3J26367@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Word "basic" added.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > On reflection, the only changes I suggest are:
> >
> > 1) the phrase "This allows for a type of table partitioning" have the
> > word "basic" inserted within it to become: "This allows for a basic type
> > of table partitioning"
>
> How about just: Initial support for table partitioning. Yes it is
> non-committal but that is a good thing since nobody 100% agrees anyway.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
> --
> Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
> Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
> Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trent Shipley 2005-09-22 23:34:16 Re: R: feature proposal ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-09-22 23:20:56 Re: 2 forks for md5?