From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON |
Date: | 2005-08-09 16:46:51 |
Message-ID: | 20050809164651.GA3136@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:47:42AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Re: MySQL, you may have talked to different people than me. However, my
> experience was that the people who were agitated about "competition" with
> MySQL were PostgreSQL community members, not third parties. That is, there
That may be the case. This was an impression formed mostly at the
booth, where I was fielding questions from people who were explicitly
asking me whether Postgres was going to be around to compete with
MySQL.
Explaining how licensing and publicity worked was helpful in this
context. But also, given that this is a discussion I sometimes find
myself having in my day job, it's an issue I'm particularly sensitive
to. (It's also why I was so happy to hear Aaron Thul's (sp?)
presentation.)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2005-08-09 18:25:35 | Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON |
Previous Message | elein | 2005-08-09 16:16:05 | Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON |