pgperl vs dbd-perl

From: David <dbree(at)duo-county(dot)com>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgperl vs dbd-perl
Date: 2005-08-09 14:45:39
Message-ID: 20050809144539.GB1756@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

I'm wondering which of the two is considered the best. I have both
installed on my system and actually have done some work with PgPerl
because it looked a bit less complicated, and at first, I thought that
this might be a more postgres-specific interface.

However, in researching the mailing lists, etc, it seems that DBD:: is
getting the most attention - in fact, I see little mention of PgPerl,
and the PgPerl list seems rather quiet.

In addition, it appears that DBD can do things that PgPerl can't. For
example, I haven't been able to find an escape-string function in
PgPerl, which I'm now looking to implement. Would one need to write his
own escape-string for PgPerl?

Is PgPerl still viable or is DBD the way to go?

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Davis 2005-08-09 14:57:41 Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-08-03 15:32:23 ECPG ignores SAVEPOINT if first statement of a transaction