From: | David <dbree(at)duo-county(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgperl vs dbd-perl |
Date: | 2005-08-09 14:45:39 |
Message-ID: | 20050809144539.GB1756@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
I'm wondering which of the two is considered the best. I have both
installed on my system and actually have done some work with PgPerl
because it looked a bit less complicated, and at first, I thought that
this might be a more postgres-specific interface.
However, in researching the mailing lists, etc, it seems that DBD:: is
getting the most attention - in fact, I see little mention of PgPerl,
and the PgPerl list seems rather quiet.
In addition, it appears that DBD can do things that PgPerl can't. For
example, I haven't been able to find an escape-string function in
PgPerl, which I'm now looking to implement. Would one need to write his
own escape-string for PgPerl?
Is PgPerl still viable or is DBD the way to go?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sean Davis | 2005-08-09 14:57:41 | Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-08-03 15:32:23 | ECPG ignores SAVEPOINT if first statement of a transaction |