On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:44:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> If it's a matter of whether VACUUM removes rows or not, that's expected:
> open-transaction bookkeeping is done across the whole cluster. (This is
> not something simple to change, since we may have to consider
> transaction IDs in shared catalogs.)
I wonder if this restriction could be lifted if we tracked last-vacuum-
Xid per relation?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"Cuando mañana llegue pelearemos segun lo que mañana exija" (Mowgli)