Re: Autotools update

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autotools update
Date: 2005-07-02 22:07:28
Message-ID: 20050702190652.S1033@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Does the FreeBSD one actually produce different output?
>
> If it did not, why would they bother making a separate package called
> "gnu-autoconf" with the note "This port is specifically designed for
> developers that want to create cross-platform software distributions on
> FreeBSD."?

If it did produce different output, why haven't we noticed it prior to
this? Has there actually *been* a problem that nobody has reported?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-07-02 22:29:28 Re: Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) - Initial Review requested
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-07-02 21:47:13 Re: Dbsize backend integration