From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, mail(at)joeconway(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problem with dblink regression test |
Date: | 2005-06-27 19:50:55 |
Message-ID: | 20050627195054.GV89438@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 03:44:41PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:10:47PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >
> >
> >>http://stats.distributed.net/~buildfarm/libcheck.log. Note that Tom's
> >>theory is correct: psql is linking against the buildfarm libpq while
> >>dblink is linking against the system one.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >BTW, after looking through that logfile, it appears that all the
> >libraries are linking against the system libraries instead of the
> >buildfarm/*/inst libraries, so this isn't specifically a dblink or even
> >contrib issue.
> >
> >
>
> I only saw problems with libecpg.so, libecpg_compat.so and dblink.so
AFAICT those are the only libraries that link to libpq or any other
postgresql library, so yes, they'd be the only ones with a problem. :)
BTW, anyone have any idea why my other two emails haven't gone out to
the list yet? Is it because of their size?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2005-06-27 20:27:43 | GCC pointer signedness (and other) warnings |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-06-27 19:50:30 | Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-27 20:20:24 | Re: COPY FROM performance improvements |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-27 19:44:41 | Re: Problem with dblink regression test |