| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets |
| Date: | 2005-05-14 18:36:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200505142036.37451.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> It occurs to me that maybe we should just add src/pl to the toplevel
> installcheck target, which would make the whole thing pretty
> automatic. However, contrib isn't in that target, so maybe the PLs
> shouldn't be either. Thoughts?
Contrib isn't built by default, so it isn't tested by default. But the
PLs that are built should also be tested, I think.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-14 18:53:56 | Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-14 17:59:54 | Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-14 18:53:56 | Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-14 17:59:54 | Re: [HACKERS] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets |