Re: Clay Shirky observation regarding MySQL

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: bill(at)wadley(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Clay Shirky observation regarding MySQL
Date: 2005-02-28 22:00:32
Message-ID: 20050228220022.GD27668@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 01:46:16PM -0600, bill(at)wadley(dot)org wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Clay Shirky made a comment about MySQL that I thought the PostgreSQL
> community should be aware of:
>
> http://www.shirky.com/writings/situated_software.html
>
> It's the section (mostly toward the bottom) entitled, "The Nature of
> Programming, and the Curious Case of MySQL". The whole article is, as
> normal, interesting and thought-provoking.

Interesting article, but w.r.t. to the MySQL statement, I read: If you
don't need any of the things that databases are good for (ACID,
transactions, triggers, views) then MySQL is an acceptable choice.

--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh 2005-02-28 22:43:19 PGconn
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-02-28 21:44:09 Re: to_char bug?